Semi-Annual
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
1- , Shakorim630@gmail.com
Abstract: (11 Views)
An analysis of Sheila Blair's methodological approach in reading Iranian Islamic inscriptions, with an emphasis on the connection between the text and the architectural context.
Abstract
Sheila Blair's book, The First Inscriptions of Early Islamic Iran, is a seminal work in architectural epigraphy, marking a turning point in the historiography of Islamic art. By compiling the most extensive collection of inscriptions from the first five centuries, Blair sought to establish a precise chronology of the buildings from this period. Her approach, grounded in linear historiography and stylistic documentation, although pioneering for subsequent research, is not without shortcomings. The present study, adopting an "analytical-critical" approach, aims to uncover the fundamental deficiencies of this methodology. The central argument is that despite its historical richness, Blair's method suffers from reductionism due to its predominantly formalist lens; she primarily views inscriptions as mere documents for determining the date and attribution of monuments, thereby neglecting their multiple semantic layers. To overcome this limitation, this article poses the pivotal question of how one might move beyond Blair's linear reading toward a semiotic analysis in which inscriptions are considered dynamic, interactive texts engaging with the audience. By employing a descriptive-analytical method and semiotic modeling—where formal complexity (C) is treated as a function of hegemonic significations (M)—we investigate the underlying structures of power. The findings reveal that Blair overlooks two crucial components: first, the function of inscriptions as "ideological image-texts" within the discourse of ruling power, serving to legitimize sovereigns; and second, the rupture between her analyses and the physical and spatial context of architecture, despite the fact that the physical placement of an inscription (e.g., on a portal or a mihrab) significantly affects audience reception. Ultimately, this study proposes an alternative model for transitioning from descriptive historiography to structuralist semiotics, one in which the dialectical interaction between "text" and "architecture" becomes the axis of analysis, allowing inscriptions to be reinterpreted as multi-layered sign systems.
Abstract
Sheila Blair's book, The First Inscriptions of Early Islamic Iran, is a seminal work in architectural epigraphy, marking a turning point in the historiography of Islamic art. By compiling the most extensive collection of inscriptions from the first five centuries, Blair sought to establish a precise chronology of the buildings from this period. Her approach, grounded in linear historiography and stylistic documentation, although pioneering for subsequent research, is not without shortcomings. The present study, adopting an "analytical-critical" approach, aims to uncover the fundamental deficiencies of this methodology. The central argument is that despite its historical richness, Blair's method suffers from reductionism due to its predominantly formalist lens; she primarily views inscriptions as mere documents for determining the date and attribution of monuments, thereby neglecting their multiple semantic layers. To overcome this limitation, this article poses the pivotal question of how one might move beyond Blair's linear reading toward a semiotic analysis in which inscriptions are considered dynamic, interactive texts engaging with the audience. By employing a descriptive-analytical method and semiotic modeling—where formal complexity (C) is treated as a function of hegemonic significations (M)—we investigate the underlying structures of power. The findings reveal that Blair overlooks two crucial components: first, the function of inscriptions as "ideological image-texts" within the discourse of ruling power, serving to legitimize sovereigns; and second, the rupture between her analyses and the physical and spatial context of architecture, despite the fact that the physical placement of an inscription (e.g., on a portal or a mihrab) significantly affects audience reception. Ultimately, this study proposes an alternative model for transitioning from descriptive historiography to structuralist semiotics, one in which the dialectical interaction between "text" and "architecture" becomes the axis of analysis, allowing inscriptions to be reinterpreted as multi-layered sign systems.
Keywords: Sheila Blair, Early Islamic Inscriptions, Epigraphy, Historiographical Approach, Epigraphic Analysis.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Contact Us
Address: Faculty of Islamic Crafts, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Azadi St., Hakim Nezami Sq., Tabriz, Iran. PostalCode: 51385-4567
E-mail: tiaj
tabriziau.ac.ir
Phone: +(98) 4135297551
E-mail: tiaj
tabriziau.ac.irPhone: +(98) 4135297551
