Volume 6, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2022)
JIC 2022, 6(2): 51-57 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moghimi Z, Ashouri M T. (2022). A Study at Technical Differences in the “Zahak Execution” paintings by Safavi Era painters with Mohammad Ghasem and Mohammad Yousef Case Study. JIC. 6(2), 51-57. doi:10.52547/jic.6.2.51
URL: http://jih-tabriziau.ir/article-1-229-en.html
URL: http://jih-tabriziau.ir/article-1-229-en.html
1- MA in Islamic Arts (Persian Painting) from Tehran National Garden University of Arts, Tehran – Iran. , moghimizohreh@gmail.com
2- Tehran Art University, Tehran, Iran
2- Tehran Art University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2837 Views)
The history of art, as the history of thought, emphasizes the point that by examining the artworks of each period and studying and analyzing them, one can understand the intellectual-cultural, economic and political situation of that society. The Safavid period, as one of the most important artistic periods in Iran, is no exception to this rule. The change of themes, dimensions, techniques, construction methods, and the emergence of personal styles in the artworks of the Safavid era indicate fundamental changes in the structure of society and art patrons in this period.
The Safavid period is a turning point in Iran's political-social developments after Islam, period which begins with the rule of Shah Ismail Safavi and reached the peak of prosperity with the reign of Shah Abbas arrive As in other fields The art of painting has also been influenced by the political, social, economic and religious developments of this period. Including these effects It is possible to point out the removal of the art of painting from the monopoly of the court Kind If until this period, the major works of painting in the workshop Royal or in the workshop produced by local rulers In this period, ordinary people of the society also commissioned painting works in single form leaf on brought and has become a new patron of art and artist are Another result of this situation is the freedom of the artists and the faster completion of the works, the style and pen, and the different techniques of the artists. A topic that today is very effective in the version Identification and separation of works without figures of artists from each other. In this research, two works with a single theme and an emphasis on the special pen of each artist, from two painters of the Safavid era, "Mohammed Ghasem" and "Mohammed Youssef" have been discussed. The chosen topic is "Taking Laughter". The images of this research are selected from Winsor's Shahnameh and Rashida's Shahnameh, after the narration of the picture, by putting these two works together and matching them Based on the work style of each artist and the comparison of processing and construction techniques, each artist's pen has been tried to be identified and the work style of each one explained. The main question of the research is the existence of the difference between the pen and the construction technique of Mohammad Qasim and Mohammad Youssef and its reasons, Ali in spite of Being a period in the Safavid era. This research is descriptive-analytical and study library documents And observation and analysis of the works has been done. In this study, the statistical population includes three pictures of the scene of the hanging of Zahak, which has been analyzed and compared qualitatively through deductive and inductive reasoning. Based on the findings The results of this research, due to the social, political and economic situation during the time of Mohammad Qasim and Mohammad Youssef, May Ability to distinguish between pen and technique The construction of these two artists P win, the main reason for which is the existence of a new class of patrons of artists in the Safavid era.
The Safavid period is a turning point in Iran's political-social developments after Islam, period which begins with the rule of Shah Ismail Safavi and reached the peak of prosperity with the reign of Shah Abbas arrive As in other fields The art of painting has also been influenced by the political, social, economic and religious developments of this period. Including these effects It is possible to point out the removal of the art of painting from the monopoly of the court Kind If until this period, the major works of painting in the workshop Royal or in the workshop produced by local rulers In this period, ordinary people of the society also commissioned painting works in single form leaf on brought and has become a new patron of art and artist are Another result of this situation is the freedom of the artists and the faster completion of the works, the style and pen, and the different techniques of the artists. A topic that today is very effective in the version Identification and separation of works without figures of artists from each other. In this research, two works with a single theme and an emphasis on the special pen of each artist, from two painters of the Safavid era, "Mohammed Ghasem" and "Mohammed Youssef" have been discussed. The chosen topic is "Taking Laughter". The images of this research are selected from Winsor's Shahnameh and Rashida's Shahnameh, after the narration of the picture, by putting these two works together and matching them Based on the work style of each artist and the comparison of processing and construction techniques, each artist's pen has been tried to be identified and the work style of each one explained. The main question of the research is the existence of the difference between the pen and the construction technique of Mohammad Qasim and Mohammad Youssef and its reasons, Ali in spite of Being a period in the Safavid era. This research is descriptive-analytical and study library documents And observation and analysis of the works has been done. In this study, the statistical population includes three pictures of the scene of the hanging of Zahak, which has been analyzed and compared qualitatively through deductive and inductive reasoning. Based on the findings The results of this research, due to the social, political and economic situation during the time of Mohammad Qasim and Mohammad Youssef, May Ability to distinguish between pen and technique The construction of these two artists P win, the main reason for which is the existence of a new class of patrons of artists in the Safavid era.
Type of Study: Original Research |
Subject:
2
Received: 2022/12/6 | Accepted: 2023/04/20 | Published: 2023/05/25
Received: 2022/12/6 | Accepted: 2023/04/20 | Published: 2023/05/25
References
1. Azhand, Y. (2005). Isfahan painting school. Tehran: Art Academy.
2. Brazill, George,1976, "Persian Painting" ,New York.
3. -Hosseini, M. (1390). The Shahnameh of Qarchghai Khan. Spring, Journal of Fine Arts, Visual Arts, No. 45,14-20
4. Karbasi, C. and others (2004). Masterpieces of Iranian painting. Tehran: Museum of Contemporary Arts Publications
5. Karimzade Tabrizi, M. A. (1370). Status and works of ancient Iranian painters. Volume III
6. Khalaj Amirhosseini, M. (1389). Secrets hidden in the art of painting. Tehran: Aban book.
7. Mousavi Lar, A. Mesbah, Gita (2013). Journal of Fine Arts, Visual Arts, No. 45, 26.
8. Moghimi, Z. (2017). Investigating the social and religious factors of the Safavid era on the works of Mohammad Ghasem painter with an iconographic approach. Art university.
9. Pakzad, Z. (2013). A look at the methods of formation of Rashida's Shahnameh pictures, Jahlo Hanar, No.88.
10. Pakbaz, R. (1378). Encyclopedia of Art. Tehran: Contemporary Culture
11. Phalsaphi, N. (2014). Investigating the characteristics and comparative study of the drawing of the zahak during the Timurid and Fawi eras of the two Shahnamehs of Baysanqari-Shah Tehamasbi, 14-18.
12. Robinson, B.W. Sims. E. Bayani, M. (2007). The Windsor Shahnama of 1648, Azimuth, London.
13. Rashida's Shahnameh of the middle of the 11th century A.H., preserved in the library of Golestan Palace, Mohammad Yusuf. (Golestan Palace copy archive)
14. Rahimifar, M. (1377). Introduction of some ancient buildings and artists of the Safavid era based on Nasrabadi's Tazkira. No. 29 and 30, 55-65.
15. Sarmadi, A. (2017). Encyclopaedia of artists of Iran and Islam. Tehran: Hirbad.
16. Soheili Khansari, A. (1354). Art and People, No. 844, 28.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Contact Us
Address: Faculty of Islamic Crafts, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Azadi St., Hakim Nezami Sq., Tabriz, Iran. PostalCode: 51385-4567
E-mail: tiaj
tabriziau.ac.ir
Phone: +(98) 4135297551
E-mail: tiaj
tabriziau.ac.irPhone: +(98) 4135297551
