-------------- --------------
Volume 9, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2025)                   JIC 2025, 9(2): 241-261 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shirani M, Hasanvand M K, Kashavarz Afshar M. (2025). The Model of Sustainable Design Development for Baloch Embroidery Based on Design Thinking. JIC. 9(2), 241-261. doi:10.61882/jic.9.2.424
URL: http://jih-tabriziau.ir/article-1-424-en.html
1- Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Painting, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran , mkh@modares.ac.ir
3- Department of Art Research, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (662 Views)
Traditional Iranian handicrafts embody indigenous knowledge and cultural capital, yet within contemporary markets, they face challenges regarding design innovation and sustainable framing. The present study investigates Baloch embroidery through a design thinking lens to identify and operationalize sustainable design value indicators within a specific local context. The research questions are as follow: Which value indicators define sustainable design in Baloch embroidery, and how can these indicators be reinforced through a participatory design process? In order to answer the questions, a qualitative case study was conducted using field observations and semi-structured interviews with 28 Baloch artisans and entrepreneurs. Open and axial coding produced fourteen value indicators across four dimensions—economic–social, cultural and local knowledge transmission, environmental, and aesthetic–innovative—which informed a co-creative design workshop and the development of five prototype products. The findings indicate that integrating value indicators into iterative design thinking cycles simultaneously enhances cultural, social, and aesthetic outcomes. Five conceptual principles—authenticity, participation, material sensitivity, narrative, and continuity—emerged as regulatory mechanisms guiding the design process. This study contributes a value-based, context-sensitive model for sustainable design development in Baloch embroidery, with insights interpreted within the examined cultural setting. The proposed model re-conceptualizes design thinking by shifting its organizing logic from problem-solving to value negotiation, positioning indigenous knowledge and artisan agency as foundational rather than peripheral to the design process. The results further highlight the potential of co-creative methodologies in bridging the gap between traditional craft practices and contemporary design demands. These findings suggest that sustainable design frameworks developed through embedded participatory fieldwork may offer more culturally coherent pathways for craft innovation than top-down methodological transfers.
Full-Text [PDF 1165 kb]   (502 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research | Subject: 4
Received: 2025/10/22 | Accepted: 2025/12/24 | Published: 2025/12/30

References
1. Abisuga, O. A., & Sirayi, M. H. (2018). The role of design in sustainable development of handicraft industries. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development,
2. 10(2), 381-388. [DOI:10.1080/20421338.2018.1461968]
3. Atalay, D. (2015). Women's collaboration for the enhancement of craft culture in [DOI:10.1386/crre.6.2.223_1]
4. contemporary Turkey. Craft Research, 6(2): 223-239.
6. Bofylatos, S., & Spyrou, T. (2017). Meaning, knowledge and artifacts, giving a voice to [DOI:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352938]
7. tacit knowledge. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4422-S4433.
9. Bryan-Kinns, N., Wang, W., & Ji, T. (2022). Qi2He: A co-design framework inspired by eastern epistemology. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 160, 1-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102773]
10. Delice, S. (2022). Critiques of appropriation and transnational labor ethics. Fashion Theory - Journal of Dress Body and Culture, 26(4): 475-491. [DOI:10.1080/1362704X.2022.2046869]
12. Droege, J. (2022). The Handmade Effect: A Model of Conscious Shopping in an Industrialised Economy. Rev Ind Organ 60: 263-292. [DOI:10.1007/s11151-021-09844-9]
13. Guo, J., & Ahn, B. (2021). Collaborative design intervention in the traditional Chinese
14. handicraft sector for enhancing cultural sustainability: New channel social innovation
15. project. Archives of Design Research, 34(4), 39-53.
17. Ho, M. C. (2010). From learning design to design discipline. Science Development, (453): 6-11.
18. Hu, J., Hur, E., & Thomas, B. (2023). Value-creating practices and barriers for collaboration between designers and artisans: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 17(1), 25-36. [DOI:10.1080/17543266.2023.2228337]
19. Lavin, M. C. (2019). Craft and design partnerships in the Chilean context: A critical [DOI:10.1080/14606925.2019.1595411]
20. perspective. The Design Journal, 22(sup1): 967-979.
22. Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Leifer, L. (2018). The design thinking playbook (1st ed.). Wiley.
23. https://www.perlego.com/book/2777848
24. Li, W., Ho, M.-C., & Yang, C. (2019). A design thinking-based study of the prospect of the
25. sustainable development of traditional handicrafts. Sustainability, 11(18): Article 4823.
27. Luckman, S. (2015). Craft and the creative economy. [Edition unavailable]. Palgrave [DOI:10.1057/9781137399687]
28. Macmillan. https://www.perlego.com/book/3490139
29. Martínez Torán, M., Esteve Sendra, C., & Moreno Cuesta, R. (2017). Scenarios for design and craft. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S2778-S2788. [DOI:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352789]
30. Mignosa A., & Kotipalli, P. (2019). A cultural economic analysis of craft. Palgrave [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-02164-1]
31. Macmillan. https://www.perlego.com/book/3495178
32. Murzyn-Kupisz, M., & Działek, J. (2013). Cultural heritage in building and enhancing social [DOI:10.1108/20441261311317392]
33. capital. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(1): 35-
35. Noronha, R. (2018). The collaborative turn: Challenges and limits on the construction of a common plan and on autonomía in design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 11(2): 125-135. [DOI:10.29147/dat.v6i3.453]
36. Penty, J. (2019). Product design and sustainability (1st ed.). Routledge. Available at: [DOI:10.4324/9780203732076-1]
37. https://www.perlego.com/book/1616045
38. Potts, J., van der Meer, J., & Daitchman, J. (2010). The state of sustainability initiatives reviews 2010: Sustainability and transparency. International Institute for Sustainable Development.
39. Reubens, R. R. R. (2016). To craft, by design, for sustainability: Towards holistic
40. sustainability design for developing-country enterprises [Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology]. Design for Sustainability (IDE).
41. 10.4233/uuid:0c2c14c8-9550-449d-b1ff-7e0588ccd6c2
42. Rombe, O. S. C. (2020). The Sui utik, creative works and tembawang: Retaining biodiversity in kalimantan, Indonesia. ETropic: Electronic Journal of Studies in the Tropics, 19(1): 124-150. [DOI:10.25120/etropic.19.1.2020.3696]
43. Sanders, E. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). "Co-creation and the new landscapes of design". CoDesign, 4 (1): 5-18. https:// [DOI:10.1080/15710880701875068]
44. doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
45. Shafi, M., Sarker, M. N. I., & Junrong, L. (2019). Social network of small creative firms and
46. its effects on innovation in developing countries. SAGE Open, 9(4): 1-16.
48. Spinuzzi, C. (2005). "The methodology of participatory design". Technical
49. Communication, 52 (2): 163-174.
50. Thorpe, A. (2007). The designer's atlas of sustainability. Island Press. [DOI:10.2307/jj.41379780]
51. Tung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring craft design collaborations in revitalizing
52. a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6(3): 71-84.
53. Tung, F. W. (2021). An entrepreneurial process to build a sustainable business for [DOI:10.1080/14606925.2021.1883790]
54. indigenous craft revitalization. The Design Journal, 24(3): 363-383.
56. Väänänen, N., & Pöllänen, S. (2020). Conceptualizing sustainable craft: Concept analysis of [DOI:10.1080/14606925.2020.1718276]
57. literature. The Design Journal, 23(1): 1-23. [DOI:10.1080/14606925.2020.1718276]
58. Walker, S., Evans, M., & Mullagh, L. (2019). Meaningful practices: The contemporary
59. relevance of traditional making for sustainable material futures. Craft Research, 10(2): 183- [DOI:10.1386/crre_00002_1]
61. Wang, W., Bryan-Kinns, N., & Sheridan, J. G. (2020). On the role of in-situ making and
62. evaluation in designing across cultures. CoDesign, 16(3): 233-250.
64. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
65. Yadav, U. S., Tripathi, R., Yadav, G. P., & Tripathi, M. A. (2022). Proposal of a global
66. handicraft index for sustainable development: A visionary approach for small industry and
67. developing strategies for handicraft (rural industry). European Journal of Sustainable
68. Development Research, 6(2), Article em0185. [DOI:10.21601/ejosdr/11909]
69. Yu, E. (2018). Designing for value: Insights from the emotional appraisal approach to [DOI:10.1080/14606925.2018.1407540]
70. understanding user value. The Design Journal, 21(2): 185-207.
72. Zi, M. (2021, July 2). A pedagogical design model of the sustainable development of traditional handicrafts in design education. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on New Approaches in Education. [DOI:10.33422/3rd.icnaeducation.2021.07.107]
73. Estakhri, A. I. (1968). Masalik wa Mamalik (Edited by Iraj Afshar). Tehran: Bongah Tarjomeh va Nashr-e Ketab. [In Persian].
74. Ghorbani, S., Kianmehr, G., & Ashouri, M. T. (2014). The role of design in the development and growth of artistic entrepreneurship in the field of handicrafts. Pajouhesh-e Honar (Art Research), 6(Summer), 111-118. [In Persian].
75. Keshavarz, G., & Javadi, S. (2016). The relationship between cultural symbols and Baluchi embroidery. Honar va Tamaddon-e Shargh (Art and Civilization of the East Quarterly), 4(13): 13-22. [In Persian].
76. Yavari, H., Mansouri, A., & Soltani, S. (2011). Introduction to Traditional Arts of Iran (Vol. 3). Tehran: Azar Publishing. [In Persian].

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Islamic Crafts

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb